Dredging impacts

Miner's News07/22/2009Economic Impact of Suction Gold Dredging in California is Over $52 Million Per YearEconomic Impact of Suction Gold Dredging in California is Over $52 Million Per Yearby Scott HarnEditor/PublisherICMJ’s Prospecting and Mining JournalThe SurveysAn Environmental Impact Report on suction gold dredging was completed by the State of California in 1994. As part of this process, the State sent out two survey questionnaires. The first questionnaire was sent to over 4,000 individuals. Nearly 2,000 were returned completed. The surveys covered dredge locations, annual spending activity, amount invested in dredging equipment, nozzle size and related questions. The second survey was sent to county Boards of Supervisors, Chambers of Commerce and mining businesses to determine the importance of suction gold dredging on local economies. A sample of 1,257 of the individual surveys was used by the State to complete a statistical analysis.The Results“Suction dredging is an activity that requires a substantial investment.” It was determined that each suction dredger spent approximately $9,250 per year on expenses related to suction dredging in 1994. This included motels, camp fees, food, gas, oil, equipment maintenance and repairs related to suction dredging. Suction gold dredgers are currently spending approximately $13,249 each per year when adjusted for inflation.The expenditures cited above did not include the cost of the suction dredge and related equipment, which the survey found was approximately $6,000 in 1994, or $8,594 adjusted for inflation.In 2008, 3,523 suction gold dredging permits were issued in California. Adjusted for inflation, the economic impact of suction gold dredging in 2008 was $46.68 million. If only one-fifth of permitted suction gold dredgers purchased a dredge during the year, another $6.06 million would have to be added to the above figures, making the total economic impact $52.74 million per year.ConclusionSuction dredge miners contribute substantially to the economy of California.Sources•California Department of Fish and Game. 1994. Final Environmental Impact Report, Adoption of Regulations for Suction Dredge Mining. April, 1994.•CPI Index•California Department of Fish and Game, 2009. Licensing statistics, Special Permits. www.dfg.ca.gov/licensing/pdffiles/sp_items_10yr.pdf© ICMJ & CMJ, Inc. 2009
E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of Goldprospectorsspace to add comments!

Join Goldprospectorsspace

Comments

  • This is from a new prospector in Indiana. In our state this is a hobby only, no hope for income from prospecting. Indiana is in the process of writing new regulations to allow for the first time suction dredging in the rivers and streams. This was achieved by the southern Indiana clubs inviting the Dept. of Natural Resources people to witness first hand the dredging operations. (in creeks on private property). Once they saw the dredging process, they determined it to be a low impact activity with potentially favorable benefits to the states waters. Removal of lead and other heavy metals, bringing the gravels to the surface, and generally improving the streambed habitat.
    The river that I live near has several species of protected mussels, but has not been excluded from dredging once DNR saw the demonstration. The mussels were pulled through the dredge, went down the sluice and were inspected on exiting, no harm done. Dredging does stir up the water, but it is small compared to what mother nature does on a regular basis.
    I hope this post is helpful in educating the politicians in California. I probably should have written it in crayon so they could understand. (forgive me ) bj
  • SCOTT
    I JUST E-MAILED THIS TO GOV.
  • Mining is a right, not a privlige like a drivers license. Under the 1872 mining law we are subject to reasonable regulation, not prohabition. If Ca passes this, you in the the rest of the nation are soon to follow. Call the state and voice your opinion
  • Plus, it doesn't include the indirect benefits, such as the value of all the lead and mercury removed from the waters, improved spawning habitat, etc.
  • I hope you sent this to the CA Governor's office. Good stuff!
This reply was deleted.